Larsh v. Larsh

Fayette County Court

Larsh v. Larsh

1 Add. 310

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County

DecidedSeptember 15, 1796

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Add. 310 (Larsh v. Larsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larsh v. Larsh, 1 Add. 310 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1796).

Pincite

Opinion

President.

On the questions proposed, my opinion is—

1. That either by the will, or by the act of assembly, this was not a joint tenancy.

2. There might have been room to doubt whether the act of assembly was not applicable only to lands derived from an intestate father. However this may have been; since the case of Kerlin v. Bull, it appears, that, by the act of assembly, the son John having died intestate, in his minority, unmarried and without issue, the estate descending to him from his father is to be equally divided among the surviving children of his father.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

President.

On the questions proposed, my opinion is—

1. That either by the will, or by the act of assembly, this was not a joint tenancy.

2. There might have been room to doubt whether the act of assembly was not applicable only to lands derived from an intestate father. However this may have been; since the case of Kerlin v. Bull, it appears, that, by the act of assembly, the son John having died intestate, in his minority, unmarried and without issue, the estate descending to him from his father is to be equally divided among the surviving children of his father.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Add. 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larsh-v-larsh-pactcomplfayett-1796.