Larsen v. Wright
This text of 2012 UT App 9 (Larsen v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DECISION
11 James H. Larsen appeals the trial court's order dismissing his complaint. *891 This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on the lack of a substantial question for review. Larsen failed to respond to the motion. As a result of his failure to respond and the lack of a viable legal issue identified in his docketing statement, he has failed to identify a substantial question for review warranting further consideration by this court. See Utah R.App. P. 10. Absent a substantial issue for review, this court may summarily affirm a district court's order.
{ 2 Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 UT App 9, 268 P.3d 890, 699 Utah Adv. Rep. 56, 2012 Utah App. LEXIS 5, 2012 WL 34450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larsen-v-wright-utahctapp-2012.