Larsen v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Larsen v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

533 S.W.3d 794

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2017·No. No. ED 104718·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Deborah Larsen (“Plaintiff’), on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, entered pursuant to jury verdict, in favor of Philip Morris USA Inc. (“Defendant”). For the reasons herein, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Deborah Larsen (“Plaintiff’), on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, entered pursuant to jury verdict, in favor of Philip Morris USA Inc. (“Defendant”). For the reasons herein, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Larsen v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 533 S.W.3d 794 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

533 S.W.3d 794 (Larsen v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.