Larsen v. Muller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Larsen v. Muller

248 A.D. 907, 291 N.Y.S. 410, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8031

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 907 (Larsen v. Muller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larsen v. Muller, 248 A.D. 907, 291 N.Y.S. 410, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Judgment for fifty dollars in favor of the plaintiff, and order denying motion to set aside the verdict, reversed on the facts, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within ten days from the entry of the order hereon defendant stipulate to increase to $500 the amount of the verdict rendered in plaintiff’s favor; in which event the judgment as so increased, and the order, are unanimously affirmed, without costs. The court having found on the issue of liability in favor of the plaintiff, the award of damages was wholly inadequate under the undisputed testimony. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Judgment for fifty dollars in favor of the plaintiff, and order denying motion to set aside the verdict, reversed on the facts, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within ten days from the entry of the order hereon defendant stipulate to increase to $500 the amount of the verdict rendered in plaintiff’s favor; in which event the judgment as so increased, and the order, are unanimously affirmed, without costs. The court having found on the issue of liability in favor of the plaintiff, the award of damages was wholly inadequate under the undisputed testimony. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 907, 291 N.Y.S. 410, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larsen-v-muller-nyappdiv-1936.