Larsen v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

438 F. App'x 894
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 26, 2011
DocketNos. 10-12936, 10-12937
StatusPublished

This text of 438 F. App'x 894 (Larsen v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larsen v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 438 F. App'x 894 (11th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After the parties filed their appellate briefs in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011). The [895]*895district court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to stay the proceedings pending arbitration is VACATED, and this case is fully REMANDED to the district court. The District Court is to reconsider the ease in the light of the Supreme Court’s Concepcion opinion. In the district court, discovery is to be limited to issues bearing significantly on the arbitrability of this dispute until the question of arbitrability has been decided.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
438 F. App'x 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larsen-v-jp-morgan-chase-bank-na-ca11-2011.