Larsen v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Eleventh Circuit

Larsen v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

438 F. App'x 894

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 26, 2011·No. Nos. 10-12936, 10-12937·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After the parties filed their appellate briefs in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011). The [895] district court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to stay the proceedings pending arbitration is VACATED, and this case is fully REMANDED to the district court. The District Court is to reconsider the ease in the light of the Supreme Court’s Concepcion opinion. In the district court, discovery is to be limited to issues bearing significantly on the arbitrability of this dispute until the question of arbitrability has been decided.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After the parties filed their appellate briefs in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011). The [895] district court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to stay the proceedings pending arbitration is VACATED, and this case is fully REMANDED to the district court. The District Court is to reconsider the ease in the light of the Supreme Court’s Concepcion opinion. In the district court, discovery is to be limited to issues bearing significantly on the arbitrability of this dispute until the question of arbitrability has been decided.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Larsen v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 438 F. App'x 894 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

438 F. App'x 894 (Larsen v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.