Larsen v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Larsen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Larsen v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Larsen

1 So. 3d 1251, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1122, 2009 WL 321614

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 11, 2009

DocketNo. 4D08-3700

StatusPublished

This text of 1 So. 3d 1251 (Larsen v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Larsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larsen v. Department of Revenue ex rel. Larsen, 1 So. 3d 1251, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1122, 2009 WL 321614 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

DAMOORGIAN, J.

John Edward Larsen appeals the trial court’s non-final order affirming the hearing officer’s recommended order finding him in contempt for non-payment of his support obligation. In a confession of error, the Department of Revenue, on behalf of Eva Larsen, confesses that the amount of child support arrearage listed in the order on appeal is not supported by the record on appeal, and that Larsen was not given the opportunity to present evidence and make argument regarding the issues raised by the Department of Revenue’s contempt motion.

We agree with the confession of error and reverse and remand for a correct determination of the child support arrearage and for an evidentiary hearing on the contempt motion.

Reversed, and Remanded.

WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAMOORGIAN, J.

John Edward Larsen appeals the trial court’s non-final order affirming the hearing officer’s recommended order finding him in contempt for non-payment of his support obligation. In a confession of error, the Department of Revenue, on behalf of Eva Larsen, confesses that the amount of child support arrearage listed in the order on appeal is not supported by the record on appeal, and that Larsen was not given the opportunity to present evidence and make argument regarding the issues raised by the Department of Revenue’s contempt motion.

We agree with the confession of error and reverse and remand for a correct determination of the child support arrearage and for an evidentiary hearing on the contempt motion.

Reversed, and Remanded.

WARNER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 So. 3d 1251, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1122, 2009 WL 321614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larsen-v-department-of-revenue-ex-rel-larsen-fladistctapp-2009.