Larsell v. Clarke
503 P.2d 500, 263 Or. 620, 1972 Ore. LEXIS 440
Opinions
We granted the petition for review in this case because it was the tentative opinion of at least three members of the court that the Court of Appeals may have erroneously applied the law of ademption as previously developed in this state. After oral argument and further study of the question, we are now of the opinion that the Court of Appeals (9 Or App 61, 495 P2d 57) correctly applied the law and its decision must therefore be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Larsell v. Clarke, 503 P.2d 500, 263 Or. 620, 1972 Ore. LEXIS 440 (Or. 1972).
503 P.2d 500 (Larsell v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gardner v. Cox
843 P.2d 469 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
Dixon v. Lindseth
624 P.2d 657 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)
Matter of Guardianship of Willbanks
588 P.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)