Larry Windeknecht v. Dr. John Doe, et al.

E.D. Missouri

Larry Windeknecht v. Dr. John Doe, et al.

DecidedOctober 15, 2025

Docket4:25-cv-00597

StatusUnknown

This text of Larry Windeknecht v. Dr. John Doe, et al. (Larry Windeknecht v. Dr. John Doe, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larry Windeknecht v. Dr. John Doe, et al., (E.D. Mo. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

LARRY WINDEKNECHT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:25-cv-0597-MTS ) DR. JOHN DOE, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Larry Windeknecht’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Doc. [2]. Plaintiff is a frequent filer in this Court. See, e.g., 1:24-cv-0044-ACL, 4:24-cv-0373-MTS, 4:25-cv-0284-AGF. Both in this matter and in the many others he has filed, someone is paying a significant amount of postage to regularly send documents to the Court. See, e.g., Doc. [1-7]. Yet Plaintiff consistently declares under penalty of perjury that he has no wages, no money of any kind, and has not received any income—including gifts—in the last twelve (12) months. In short, the Court doubts the veracity of some of Plaintiff’s statements made under penalty of perjury in his Application. For this reason, the Court will require Plaintiff to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) at Fulton State Hospital no later than November 14, 2025. While the Court recognizes that Plaintiff does not appear to be a “prisoner” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, see Perkins v. Hedricks, 340 F.3d 582, 583 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam) (litigant that “appear[ed] to be civilly committed” was “not a prisoner within the meaning of the [Prison Litigation Reform Act]”); accord Jones v. Cuomo, 2 F.4th 22, 24 (2d Cir. 2021), the Court “may consider evidence of a plaintiff's financial status when examining the truthfulness of an application to proceed in forma pauperis,’ Kirkland v. Donahoe, 1:\1-cv- 0048-KLL, 2012 WL 2360862, at *2 n.3 (S.D. Ohio June 20, 2012) (citing Speiser v. U.S. Bank, 3:10-cv-0098-TAV, 2011 WL 42232, at *4—5 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 6, 2011)). Cf 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A) (requiring that a court dismiss a case “if the court determines that” the plaintiffs “allegation of poverty is untrue’’). If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. See Hutchins v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., 116 F.3d 1256, 1259 (8th Cir. 1997) (“A district court has the power to dismiss a litigant’s cause of action when the litigant fails to comply with the court’s orders.”); see also Spallone v. United States, 493 U.S. 265, 276 (1990) (discussing “the axiom that courts have inherent power to enforce compliance with their lawful orders” (internal quotations omitted)). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than Friday, November 14, 2025, Plaintiff must submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) at Fulton State Hospital. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. Dated this 15th day of October 2025. / uh UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

LARRY WINDEKNECHT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:25-cv-0597-MTS ) DR. JOHN DOE, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Larry Windeknecht’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Doc. [2]. Plaintiff is a frequent filer in this Court. See, e.g., 1:24-cv-0044-ACL, 4:24-cv-0373-MTS, 4:25-cv-0284-AGF. Both in this matter and in the many others he has filed, someone is paying a significant amount of postage to regularly send documents to the Court. See, e.g., Doc. [1-7]. Yet Plaintiff consistently declares under penalty of perjury that he has no wages, no money of any kind, and has not received any income—including gifts—in the last twelve (12) months. In short, the Court doubts the veracity of some of Plaintiff’s statements made under penalty of perjury in his Application. For this reason, the Court will require Plaintiff to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) at Fulton State Hospital no later than November 14, 2025. While the Court recognizes that Plaintiff does not appear to be a “prisoner” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, see Perkins v. Hedricks, 340 F.3d 582, 583 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam) (litigant that “appear[ed] to be civilly committed” was “not a prisoner within the meaning of the [Prison Litigation Reform Act]”); accord Jones v. Cuomo, 2 F.4th 22, 24 (2d Cir. 2021), the Court “may consider evidence of a plaintiff's financial status when examining the truthfulness of an application to proceed in forma pauperis,’ Kirkland v. Donahoe, 1:\1-cv- 0048-KLL, 2012 WL 2360862, at *2 n.3 (S.D. Ohio June 20, 2012) (citing Speiser v. U.S. Bank, 3:10-cv-0098-TAV, 2011 WL 42232, at *4—5 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 6, 2011)). Cf 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A) (requiring that a court dismiss a case “if the court determines that” the plaintiffs “allegation of poverty is untrue’’). If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. See Hutchins v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., 116 F.3d 1256, 1259 (8th Cir. 1997) (“A district court has the power to dismiss a litigant’s cause of action when the litigant fails to comply with the court’s orders.”); see also Spallone v. United States, 493 U.S. 265, 276 (1990) (discussing “the axiom that courts have inherent power to enforce compliance with their lawful orders” (internal quotations omitted)). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than Friday, November 14, 2025, Plaintiff must submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) at Fulton State Hospital. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice. Dated this 15th day of October 2025. / uh UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

_2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Larry Windeknecht v. Dr. John Doe, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-windeknecht-v-dr-john-doe-et-al-moed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack