Larry Webb v. James White, Jr., Superintendent

57 F.3d 1067, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21788, 1995 WL 361061
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 16, 1995·No. 94-7237·Published

Opinion

57 F.3d 1067
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Larry WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James WHITE, Jr., Superintendent, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-7237.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 16, 1995.

Larry Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of The Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order* denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Webb v. White, No. CA-94-392 (E.D. Va. Sep. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to trial by magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(2) (1988)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Larry Webb v. James White, Jr., Superintendent, 57 F.3d 1067, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21788, 1995 WL 361061 (4th Cir. 1995).

57 F.3d 1067 (Larry Webb v. James White, Jr., Superintendent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.