Larry Wayne Grass v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Cummins Unit A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction

Eighth Circuit

Larry Wayne Grass v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Cummins Unit A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction

903 F.2d 1206, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8575, 1990 WL 69269

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMay 29, 1990

Docket89-2957

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 903 F.2d 1206 (Larry Wayne Grass v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Cummins Unit A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larry Wayne Grass v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Cummins Unit A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, 903 F.2d 1206, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8575, 1990 WL 69269 (8th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Wayne Grass, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint asserting a violation of his constitutional rights by the Arkansas Department of Correction’s newly implemented policy prohibiting smoking in the prison visitation area during visiting hours.

There is no constitutional right to smoke in prison. See Doughty v. Board of County Comm’rs, 731 F.Supp. 423, 426 (D.Colo.1989). The state regulation Grass cites directs prison officials to establish a smoking policy, but does not contain particularized substantive criteria to guide the officials or mandatory language requiring *1207 them to act in a certain way and thus does not create a liberty interest. See Williams v. Armontrout, 852 F.2d 377, 379 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 564, 102 L.Ed.2d 589 (1988). Grass’s complaint must also fail as an eighth amendment claim because the policy does not deprive inmates of a “minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.” Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 347, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 2399, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981). We agree with the district court that the complaint has no basis in law and is nothing more than a claim of infringement of a legal interest that does not exist. See Neitzke v. Williams, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 1831, 1833, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Larry Wayne Grass, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint asserting a violation of his constitutional rights by the Arkansas Department of Correction’s newly implemented policy prohibiting smoking in the prison visitation area during visiting hours.

There is no constitutional right to smoke in prison. See Doughty v. Board of County Comm’rs, 731 F.Supp. 423, 426 (D.Colo.1989). The state regulation Grass cites directs prison officials to establish a smoking policy, but does not contain particularized substantive criteria to guide the officials or mandatory language requiring *1207 them to act in a certain way and thus does not create a liberty interest. See Williams v. Armontrout, 852 F.2d 377, 379 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 564, 102 L.Ed.2d 589 (1988). Grass’s complaint must also fail as an eighth amendment claim because the policy does not deprive inmates of a “minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.” Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 347, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 2399, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981). We agree with the district court that the complaint has no basis in law and is nothing more than a claim of infringement of a legal interest that does not exist. See Neitzke v. Williams, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 1831, 1833, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

Accordingly, we affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

903 F.2d 1206, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8575, 1990 WL 69269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-wayne-grass-v-willis-sargent-warden-cummins-unit-al-lockhart-ca8-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack