Larry Wayne Grass v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Cummins Unit A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction

Eighth Circuit

Larry Wayne Grass v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Cummins Unit A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction

903 F.2d 1206, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8575, 1990 WL 69269

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 29, 1990·No. 89-2957·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Wayne Grass, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint asserting a violation of his constitutional rights by the Arkansas Department of Correction’s newly implemented policy prohibiting smoking in the prison visitation area during visiting hours.

There is no constitutional right to smoke in prison. See Doughty v. Board of County Comm’rs, 731 F.Supp. 423, 426 (D.Colo.1989). The state regulation Grass cites directs prison officials to establish a smoking policy, but does not contain particularized substantive criteria to guide the officials or mandatory language requiring *1207 them to act in a certain way and thus does not create a liberty interest. See Williams v. Armontrout, 852 F.2d 377, 379 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 564, 102 L.Ed.2d 589 (1988). Grass’s complaint must also fail as an eighth amendment claim because the policy does not deprive inmates of a “minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.” Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 347, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 2399, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981). We agree with the district court that the complaint has no basis in law and is nothing more than a claim of infringement of a legal interest that does not exist. See Neitzke v. Williams, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 1831, 1833, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Larry Wayne Grass, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint asserting a violation of his constitutional rights by the Arkansas Department of Correction’s newly implemented policy prohibiting smoking in the prison visitation area during visiting hours.

There is no constitutional right to smoke in prison. See Doughty v. Board of County Comm’rs, 731 F.Supp. 423, 426 (D.Colo.1989). The state regulation Grass cites directs prison officials to establish a smoking policy, but does not contain particularized substantive criteria to guide the officials or mandatory language requiring *1207 them to act in a certain way and thus does not create a liberty interest. See Williams v. Armontrout, 852 F.2d 377, 379 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 564, 102 L.Ed.2d 589 (1988). Grass’s complaint must also fail as an eighth amendment claim because the policy does not deprive inmates of a “minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.” Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 347, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 2399, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981). We agree with the district court that the complaint has no basis in law and is nothing more than a claim of infringement of a legal interest that does not exist. See Neitzke v. Williams, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 1831, 1833, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

Accordingly, we affirm.

Larry Wayne Grass v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Cummins Unit A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, 903 F.2d 1206, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 8575, 1990 WL 69269 (8th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

903 F.2d 1206 (Larry Wayne Grass v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Cummins Unit A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related