Larry Tavitas v. State
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00422-CR
Larry TAVITAS, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011CR8818 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 22, 2012
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
Appellant Larry Tavitas was sentenced on December 1, 2011. Because he did not file a
motion for new trial, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed no later than January 3,
2012. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Our records show (1) the notice of appeal was not filed until
July 6, 2012, and (2) no motion for extension of time was timely filed. See id. R. 26.3. 04-12-00422-CR
On July 19, 2012, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by August 3, 2012, why
his appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 1 To date, this court has not received
any response to the order.
This court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal of a criminal conviction in the absence of a
timely, written notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)
(“A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction.”); Shute v.
State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for
want of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
1 The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Larry Tavitas v. State (Larry Tavitas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.