Larry Shultz v. Goodyear Atomic Corporation
This text of 872 F.2d 1028 (Larry Shultz v. Goodyear Atomic Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Larry SHULTZ, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
GOODYEAR ATOMIC CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-3251.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 4, 1989.
ORDER
Before MERRITT and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges, LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED upon the opinion of the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
872 F.2d 1028, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4427, 1989 WL 34819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-shultz-v-goodyear-atomic-corporation-ca6-1989.