Larry Ray Capko v. the State of Texas
This text of Larry Ray Capko v. the State of Texas (Larry Ray Capko v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________
No. 02-24-00145-CR ___________________________
LARRY RAY CAPKO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 43rd District Court Parker County, Texas Trial Court No. CR22-0831
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Larry Ray Capko attempts to appeal his conviction, but he waived
his right of appeal when he entered into a plea bargain with the State.
“In a plea bargain case[,] . . . a defendant may appeal only . . . (A) those matters
that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the
trial court’s permission to appeal, or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly
authorized by statute.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art.
44.02. The trial court must file a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal,
clarifying whether the case involved a plea bargain and whether the defendant waived
his right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
Capko’s judgment of conviction reflects the terms of his plea bargain, and the
trial court’s certification confirms that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal”
and that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See
id. The certification here was signed not only by the trial court but also by Capko and
by his trial counsel. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
Because criminal appeals “must be dismissed if a certification that shows the
defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record,” see id., we
informed Capko that we could dismiss his appeal unless, within 10 days, he showed
grounds for continuing it. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. More than 20 days have passed
but we have not received a response.
Accordingly, we dismiss Capko’s appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).
2 /s/ Bonnie Sudderth
Bonnie Sudderth Chief Justice
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered: May 30, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Larry Ray Capko v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-ray-capko-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.