Larry Painter v. T. C. Outlaw

334 F. App'x 47
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2009·No. 08-1937·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Larry Painter appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging a 1981 Missouri escape conviction, which was used to enhance the federal sentence he is currently serving for firearm-possession offenses. The district court correctly found that it was without jurisdiction to consider the petition, as Painter is no longer “in custody” on the state conviction. See Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 492-93, 109 S.Ct. 1923, 104 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989) (per curiam) (habeas petitioner is no longer in custody after sentence has fully expired, even if prior conviction is used to enhance subsequent conviction); Love v. Tippy, 128 F.3d 1258, 1258-59 (8th Cir.1997) (per curiam) (petitioner who completed serving state sentence before federal conviction is no longer in custody under state conviction).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for die Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c),

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Larry Painter v. T. C. Outlaw, 334 F. App'x 47 (8th Cir. 2009).

334 F. App'x 47 (Larry Painter v. T. C. Outlaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maleng v. Cook
490 U.S. 488 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Lamarr Love v. J.W. Tippy
128 F.3d 1258 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)