Larry Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, In

Ninth Circuit

Larry Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, In

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2010·No. 08-56954·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LARRY MONTZ; DAENA SMOLLER,  Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 08-56954 v. D.C. No.

PILGRIM FILMS & TELEVISION, INC.;  2:06-cv-07174- NBC UNIVERSAL, INC.; CRAIG FMC-MAN PILIGIAN; JASON CONRAD HAWES; UNIVERSAL TELEVISION NETWORKS, ORDER Defendants-Appellees.



Filed September 30, 2010

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

16761

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LARRY MONTZ; DAENA SMOLLER,  Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 08-56954 v. D.C. No.

PILGRIM FILMS & TELEVISION, INC.;  2:06-cv-07174- NBC UNIVERSAL, INC.; CRAIG FMC-MAN PILIGIAN; JASON CONRAD HAWES; UNIVERSAL TELEVISION NETWORKS, ORDER Defendants-Appellees.



Filed September 30, 2010

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

16761

Larry Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, In, (9th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Larry Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, In (Larry Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, In) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.