Larry Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, In
This text of Larry Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, In (Larry Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, In) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LARRY MONTZ; DAENA SMOLLER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 08-56954 v. D.C. No. PILGRIM FILMS & TELEVISION, INC.; 2:06-cv-07174- NBC UNIVERSAL, INC.; CRAIG FMC-MAN PILIGIAN; JASON CONRAD HAWES; UNIVERSAL TELEVISION NETWORKS, ORDER Defendants-Appellees. Filed September 30, 2010
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Larry Montz v. Pilgrim Films & Television, In, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-montz-v-pilgrim-films-television-in-ca9-2010.