Larry Lee Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 23, 2018·No. 06-18-00033-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00033-CR

LARRY LEE WRIGHT, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court Red River County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR02467

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

ORDER

Our review of the clerk’s record and the court reporter’s record in this case indicates that they contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). The clerk’s record and volumes eight and nine of the reporter’s record contain the name of a person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the clerk’s record and volumes eight and nine of the reporter’s record contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s record and volumes eight and nine of the electronically filed reporter’s record in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: August 23, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Larry Lee Wright v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Larry Lee Wright v. State (Larry Lee Wright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.