Larry J. Kelley v. Office of Personnel Management

837 F.2d 1097, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 745, 1987 WL 24180
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedDecember 10, 1987
Docket87-3502
StatusUnpublished

This text of 837 F.2d 1097 (Larry J. Kelley v. Office of Personnel Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larry J. Kelley v. Office of Personnel Management, 837 F.2d 1097, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 745, 1987 WL 24180 (Fed. Cir. 1987).

Opinion

837 F.2d 1097

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Larry J. KELLEY, Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 87-3502.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 10, 1987.

Before RICH and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

DECISION

The decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (board) in No. DA831L8610548, sustaining OPM's denial of Larry J. Kelley's application for disability retirement, is affirmed.

OPINION

Our scope of review in disability cases is limited to whether "there has been a substantial departure from important procedural rights, a misconstruction of the governing legislation, or some other like error 'going to the heart of the administrative process.' " Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management, 470 U.S. 768, 791 (1985); Smith v. Office of Personnel Management, 760 F.2d 244, 246 (Fed.Cir.1985). Moreover, we cannot review the facts underlying the disability determination as Kelley requests us to do. See Lindahl, 470 U.S. at 791; Smith, 760 F.2d at 246.

To the extent that Kelley's petition raises issues within our scope of review, we have been shown no reason to reverse.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management
470 U.S. 768 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Reva M. Smith v. Office of Personnel Management
760 F.2d 244 (Federal Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
837 F.2d 1097, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 745, 1987 WL 24180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-j-kelley-v-office-of-personnel-management-cafc-1987.