Larry Grimes, Sr. v. H. Rios, Jr.

451 F. App'x 696
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 2011
Docket10-15603
StatusUnpublished

This text of 451 F. App'x 696 (Larry Grimes, Sr. v. H. Rios, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larry Grimes, Sr. v. H. Rios, Jr., 451 F. App'x 696 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Larry A. Grimes, Sr., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Grimes contends that the district court erred by dismissing his petition because a parole violation warrant, lodged as a de-tainer, violates his rights by remaining unexecuted while he serves his sentence for a 2008 bank robbery. Grimes is not currently suffering any loss of liberty because of the unexecuted parole violation warrant. He has no right to disposition of the parole violation warrant prior to the expiration of his current sentence. See Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78, 86-87, 97 S.Ct. 274, 50 L.Ed.2d 236 (1976); United States v. Garrett, 253 F.3d 443, 447-48 (9th Cir.2001). Grimes’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moody v. Daggett
429 U.S. 78 (Supreme Court, 1976)
United States v. Thomas James Garrett
253 F.3d 443 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 F. App'x 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-grimes-sr-v-h-rios-jr-ca9-2011.