Larry Glen Rolen II v. the State of Texas
This text of Larry Glen Rolen II v. the State of Texas (Larry Glen Rolen II v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00110-CR No. 07-24-00111-CR No. 07-24-00112-CR No. 07-24-00113-CR No. 07-24-00114-CR
LARRY GLEN ROLEN II, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 081970-E-CR, 081971-E-CR, 081972-E-CR, 081973-E-CR, & 082335-E-CR; Honorable Douglas R. Woodburn, Presiding
August 21, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Larry Glen Rolen II, appeals from five convictions for intoxicated
manslaughter with a motor vehicle.1 Appellant was sentenced to fifteen years of
confinement for each conviction, with two of the sentences to run concurrently and the
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.08(b). three remaining sentences to run consecutively. The reporter’s record was originally due
July 19, 2024, but we granted the reporter an extension to August 19 to file the record.
The reporter has since requested a second extension of thirty days due to her extensive
caseload and the considerable size of the record.
To expedite the disposition of the appeals and in the interest of conservation of
judicial resources, we deny the request for extension, abate the appeals, and remand the
causes to the trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial
and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely
filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to
avoid further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not
timely filed). On remand, the trial court shall determine the following:
(1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;
(2) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those tasks; and
(4) whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court finds reasonable.
Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than sixty days
to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter
to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by October
21, 2024.
2 Should the reporter file the record on or before the date the trial court acts per our
directive, she shall immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the
trial court shall not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Larry Glen Rolen II v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-glen-rolen-ii-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.