Larry Givens v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 31, 2019
Docket05-19-00377-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Larry Givens v. State (Larry Givens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larry Givens v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Order entered July 31, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00377-CR

LARRY GIVENS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18-75340-H

ORDER Appellant’s brief was due June 16, 2019. When it was not filed, we notified appellant by

postcard dated June 19, 2019, and directed him to file his brief along with a proper motion to

extend time by June 26, 2019. We cautioned appellant that the failure to do so would result in

the appeal being abated for a hearing under rule 38.8(b)(3). See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3). To

date, no brief has been filed, and we have had no communication regarding this appeal.

Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether

appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d

708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Tina Yoo Clinton,

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 1; to Valencia Bush.; and to the Dallas County

District Attorney’s Office.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated twenty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Larry Givens v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-givens-v-state-texapp-2019.