Larry E. Spruill v. Wesley Mozell, Superintendent, Production Code 67/967 (Electronics), Norfolk Naval Shipyard

Fourth Circuit

Larry E. Spruill v. Wesley Mozell, Superintendent, Production Code 67/967 (Electronics), Norfolk Naval Shipyard

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23469, 1995 WL 378522

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 27, 1995

Docket95-1070

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 167 (Larry E. Spruill v. Wesley Mozell, Superintendent, Production Code 67/967 (Electronics), Norfolk Naval Shipyard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larry E. Spruill v. Wesley Mozell, Superintendent, Production Code 67/967 (Electronics), Norfolk Naval Shipyard, 59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23469, 1995 WL 378522 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Larry E. SPRUILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wesley MOZELL, Superintendent, Production Code 67/967
(Electronics), Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1070.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 27, 1995.

Larry E. Spruill, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action alleging wrongful termination and breach of contract. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spruill v. Mozell, CA-94-760-N (E.D. Va. Nov. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Larry E. SPRUILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wesley MOZELL, Superintendent, Production Code 67/967
(Electronics), Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1070.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 27, 1995.

Larry E. Spruill, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action alleging wrongful termination and breach of contract. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spruill v. Mozell, CA-94-760-N (E.D. Va. Nov. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23469, 1995 WL 378522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-e-spruill-v-wesley-mozell-superintendent-pro-ca4-1995.