Larry Duane Crisler v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General

Tenth Circuit

Larry Duane Crisler v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General

61 F.3d 915, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26594, 1995 WL 421119

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedJuly 18, 1995

Docket94-3437

StatusPublished

This text of 61 F.3d 915 (Larry Duane Crisler v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larry Duane Crisler v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General, 61 F.3d 915, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26594, 1995 WL 421119 (10th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

61 F.3d 915

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Larry Duane CRISLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Marvin RUNYON, Postmaster General, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-3437.
(D.C. No. 94-CV-1410)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

July 18, 1995.

Before MOORE, BARRETT, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff-Appellant Larry D. Crisler ("Crisler") appeals the dismissal of his pro se complaint. The district court found Crisler's complaint of over 1500 pages to be "rambling, repetitive, inconsistent, and vague" and granted Defendant's motion to dismiss. Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a) requires a pleading to contain "a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends ... [and] a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief...." We agree with the district court that Crisler has failed to meet this standard and, therefore, AFFIRM the decision of the district court.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

61 F.3d 915

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Larry Duane CRISLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Marvin RUNYON, Postmaster General, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-3437.
(D.C. No. 94-CV-1410)

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

July 18, 1995.

Before MOORE, BARRETT, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff-Appellant Larry D. Crisler ("Crisler") appeals the dismissal of his pro se complaint. The district court found Crisler's complaint of over 1500 pages to be "rambling, repetitive, inconsistent, and vague" and granted Defendant's motion to dismiss. Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a) requires a pleading to contain "a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends ... [and] a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief...." We agree with the district court that Crisler has failed to meet this standard and, therefore, AFFIRM the decision of the district court.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 F.3d 915, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26594, 1995 WL 421119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-duane-crisler-v-marvin-runyon-postmaster-gen-ca10-1995.