Larry Dean Bell, Sr. v. State of Iowa, Sgt. Wilcox, Chris Tripp, and ISP Employees

CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa
DecidedJanuary 9, 2025
Docket23-1800
StatusPublished

This text of Larry Dean Bell, Sr. v. State of Iowa, Sgt. Wilcox, Chris Tripp, and ISP Employees (Larry Dean Bell, Sr. v. State of Iowa, Sgt. Wilcox, Chris Tripp, and ISP Employees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larry Dean Bell, Sr. v. State of Iowa, Sgt. Wilcox, Chris Tripp, and ISP Employees, (iowactapp 2025).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 23-1800 Filed January 9, 2025

LARRY DEAN BELL SR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA, SGT. WILCOX, CHRIS TRIPP, and ISP EMPLOYEES, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Lee (North) County,

Joshua P. Schier, Judge.

Larry Bell Sr. appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims of

destruction of personal property. AFFIRMED.

Larry Dean Bell, Sr., Fort Madison, self-represented appellant.

Brenna Bird, Attorney General, and H. Loraine Wallace, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellees.

Considered by Schumacher, P.J., Badding, J., and Bower, S.J.*

*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206

(2025). 2

SCHUMACHER, Presiding Judge.

Inmate Larry Bell Sr. appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his claims

of “destruction of personal property” by prison officials “over the last five (5) years”

and his request for a money judgment. The district court found Bell’s claims lacked

legal merit and had already been adjudicated. Upon our review, we conclude the

judgment of the district court is correct, no error of law appears, the questions

presented are not of sufficient importance to justify an opinion, and an opinion

would not have precedential value.1 Accordingly, we affirm without opinion

pursuant to Iowa Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.1203.

AFFIRMED.

1 The State requests that this court impose a penalty against Bell under Iowa Code

section 610A.3 (2023). Because we affirm the district court order that did not involve a dismissal under section 610A, we decline to impose sanctions. But Bell is advised that persisting in pursuing civil actions that fail to state a claim for which relief may be granted places him at risk that a future court may dismiss the action as frivolous under 610A.2 and apply penalties, including “the loss of some or all of the earned time credits” or “up to fifty percent of the average balance of the inmate account under section 904.702 or of any prisoner account.” See Iowa Code §§ 610A.2, 610A.3(1)(a)–(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 610A.2
Iowa § 610A.2

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Larry Dean Bell, Sr. v. State of Iowa, Sgt. Wilcox, Chris Tripp, and ISP Employees, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-dean-bell-sr-v-state-of-iowa-sgt-wilcox-chris-tripp-and-isp-iowactapp-2025.