Larry Dean Bartley v. Carolina Steel Corp.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia
DecidedFebruary 4, 1997
Docket2004962
StatusUnpublished

This text of Larry Dean Bartley v. Carolina Steel Corp. (Larry Dean Bartley v. Carolina Steel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larry Dean Bartley v. Carolina Steel Corp., (Va. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton

LARRY DEAN BARTLEY

v. Record No. 2004-96-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM CAROLINA STEEL CORPORATION AND FEBRUARY 4, 1997 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Robert L. Flax; Flax & Stout, on brief), for appellant. (Gregory T. Casker; Daniel, Vaughan, Medley & Smitherman, on brief), for appellees.

Larry Dean Bartley (claimant) contends that the Workers'

Compensation Commission (commission) erred in awarding him

permanent partial disability benefits based upon a 12.5%

impairment rating to his right knee rather than awarding him

benefits based upon the entire 25% impairment rating rendered by

Dr. Robert W. Sydnor. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs

of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit.

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule

5A:27.

On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable

to the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v.

Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990).

So viewed, the evidence showed that Dr. Sydnor, claimant's

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. treating orthopedic surgeon, opined that claimant's right knee

injury caused by his November 18, 1993 compensable industrial

accident was superimposed on preexisting degenerative changes in

claimant's right knee, which were causally related to a 1979

accident. Dr. Sydnor opined that claimant suffered from a 25%

impairment of his right lower extremity. Dr. Sydnor stated that

12.5% of the 25% impairment rating was causally related to

preexisting degenerative changes in claimant's right knee due to

the 1979 injury and 12.5% of the rating was causally related to

claimant's compensable November 18, 1993 industrial injury.

Claimant's testimony, which was corroborated by two witnesses,

established that claimant suffered no loss of use of his right

leg prior to the November 18, 1993 industrial injury. The commission awarded claimant permanent partial disability

benefits based upon the 12.5% impairment rating rendered by Dr.

Sydnor, giving employer credit for the 12.5% impairment causally

related to preexisting degenerative changes due to the 1979

accident. Claimant contends that the commission erred in not

awarding him permanent partial disability benefits based upon the

entire 25% impairment rating.

Dr. Sydnor's opinions provide ample support for the

commission's finding. Dr. Sydnor opined that only half of

claimant's permanent disability to his right lower extremity was

causally related to his compensable November 18, 1993 industrial

injury. An employer is not liable for that portion of a

2 compensable injury that preexisted the employer/employee

relationship. See Virginia Fibre Corp. v. Moore, 17 Va. App.

691, 693, 440 S.E.2d 432, 434 (1994) (citing Code § 65.2-505),

aff'd, 249 Va. 1, 452 S.E.2d 360 (1995).

Based upon this record, we cannot find as a matter of law

that claimant's evidence proved he was entitled to an award of

permanent partial disability benefits based upon a 25% impairment

rating. Accordingly, the commission did not err in awarding

claimant permanent partial disability benefits based upon the

12.5% impairment rating to his right lower extremity. For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Virginia Fibre Corp. v. Moore
440 S.E.2d 432 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1994)
R. G. Moore Building Corp. v. Mullins
390 S.E.2d 788 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1990)
Virginia Fibre Corp. v. Moore
452 S.E.2d 360 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Larry Dean Bartley v. Carolina Steel Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-dean-bartley-v-carolina-steel-corp-vactapp-1997.