Larry Darnell Spears v. Lieutenant Cook
This text of 60 F.3d 824 (Larry Darnell Spears v. Lieutenant Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 824
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Larry Darnell SPEARS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant COOK, Defendant--Appellee.
No. 95-6620.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 14, 1995.
Larry D. Spears, appellant pro se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spears v. Cook, No. CA-95-296-R (W.D.Va. Apr. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 824, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24902, 1995 WL 419160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-darnell-spears-v-lieutenant-cook-ca4-1995.