Larry Darnell Billings v. Robert Burton

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedOctober 4, 2022
Docket2:22-cv-06423
StatusUnknown

This text of Larry Darnell Billings v. Robert Burton (Larry Darnell Billings v. Robert Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larry Darnell Billings v. Robert Burton, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-06423-MWF-DFM Document 5 Filed 10/04/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:66

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

LARRY DARNELL BILLINGS, No. CV 22-06423-MWF (DFM)

Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

ROBERT BURTON,

Respondent.

Petitioner Larry Darnell Billings filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his 1990 conviction for first- degree murder with special circumstances. See Dkt. 1. The Court’s “Notice of Reference to a U.S. Magistrate Judge,” see Dkt. 3, was returned to sender with the notation that Petitioner died on September 13, 2022, see Dkt. 4. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) inmate locator shows no records for Mr. Billings, confirming that he is deceased. See https://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/search.aspx (search for “Billings, Larry”) (last accessed Oct. 3, 2022). A habeas petitioner must be “in custody” to challenge his detention. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A petitioner’s death renders the habeas petition moot. See Dove v. United States, 423 U.S. 325 (1976) (per curiam) (dismissing petition for a writ of certiorari from appellate decision in criminal proceedings upon Case 2:22-cv-06423-MWF-DFM Document5 Filed 10/04/22 Page 2of2 Page ID #:67

petitioner’s death); Farmer v. McDaniel, 692 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012) (upon notice of petitioner’s death, appeal dismissed as moot and case remanded to district court to dismiss habeas petition as moot); Garceau v. Woodford, 399 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2005) (“Because petitioner’s death renders this case moot, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed as moot.”); Griffey v. Lindsey, 349 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2003) (same). Here, Petitioner’s death constitutes an end to his detention; this action no longer presents a live case or controversy. Accordingly, the Petition challenging his alleged unconstitutional confinement is now moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice as moot, on account of Petitioner’s death. Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

Dated: October 4, 2022 | Y p| ICHAEL □□□ FIT LD | United States District Judge Presented by:

DOUaAS F. n—\) United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dove v. United States
423 U.S. 325 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Wallace Levan Griffey v. Gary Lindsey, Warden
349 F.3d 1157 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Robert Farmer v. E.K. McDaniel
692 F.3d 1052 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Larry Darnell Billings v. Robert Burton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-darnell-billings-v-robert-burton-cacd-2022.