Larry D. Russell v. Criminal Court Judge Joseph B. Dailey, Division 5

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedFebruary 7, 1996
Docket02A01-9509-CH-00200
StatusPublished

This text of Larry D. Russell v. Criminal Court Judge Joseph B. Dailey, Division 5 (Larry D. Russell v. Criminal Court Judge Joseph B. Dailey, Division 5) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larry D. Russell v. Criminal Court Judge Joseph B. Dailey, Division 5, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON _____________________________________________

LARRY D. RUSSELL, ) From the Chancery Court ) for Shelby County, Tennessee Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) The Hon. D.J. Alissandratos, Chancellor vs. ) ) Shelby County Chancery No. 105742-3 CRIMINAL COURT JUDGE JOSEPH ) Appeal No. 02A01-9509-CH-00200 B. DAILEY DIVISION (5) ) ) AFFIRMED Defendant/Appellee . ) ) Larry D. Russell FILED ) Cold Creek Correctional Facility ) Henning, Tennessee February 7, 1996 ) Pro Se ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) Charles W. Burson Appellate C ourt Clerk ) Attorney General and Reporter ) Mary M. Bers ) Assistant Attorney General & Reporter ) Nashville, Tennessee ) Attorney for Appellee ________________________________________________________________________

OPINION AND ORDER ________________________________________________________________________

LILLARD, J.

This cause came to be heard upon the Rule 3 appeal by appellant Larry Russell from the

Order of the trial court dismissing his claim against appellee Dailey for failure to state a claim

and lack of jurisdiction.

The parties submitted the case on brief, and on December 8, 1995, the Court placed the

case upon the accelerated Hearing Calendar, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties.

After review of the parties’ briefs and after consideration of the entire record, the Court

finds that all of the appellant’s allegations against the appellee pertain to appellee’s judicial acts.

The trial court’s dismissal of appellant’s claims for failure to state a claim and lack of jurisdiction

should be affirmed.

The trial court’s dismissal of appellant’s cause of action is hereby AFFIRMED. It is SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: This the ___ day of ____________, 1996.

_________________________________ LILLARD, J.

_________________________________ FARMER, J.

_________________________________ SUMMERS, SP. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Larry D. Russell v. Criminal Court Judge Joseph B. Dailey, Division 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-d-russell-v-criminal-court-judge-joseph-b-da-tennctapp-1996.