Larry D. Prewitt and Deborah D. Prewitt v. Jackie Neil Norsworthy
This text of Larry D. Prewitt and Deborah D. Prewitt v. Jackie Neil Norsworthy (Larry D. Prewitt and Deborah D. Prewitt v. Jackie Neil Norsworthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-15-00090-CV ____________________
LARRY D. PREWITT AND DEBORAH D. PREWITT, Appellants
V.
JACKIE NEIL NORSWORTHY, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 1A District Court Jasper County, Texas Trial Cause No. 33060 ________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER
In their brief on appeal, appellants Larry D. Prewitt and Deborah D. Prewitt
urge that the trial court erred in failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of
law and they request an abatement of the appeal for entry of findings. See Tex. R.
App. P. 44.4(a). Appellee Jackie Neil Norsworthy suggests the error did not
prevent appellants from properly presenting their case to the Court of Appeals
because appellants challenge each of appellee’s multiple theories of recovery in
their brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.1(a)(2). After reviewing the parties’ briefs and
1 the appellate record, we conclude that findings of fact and conclusions of law are
necessary for the proper presentation of the appeal and the trial court can correct its
failure to act by making written findings of fact and conclusions of law that will
assist this Court’s decision in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4(b).
We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court for entry of
findings of fact and conclusions of law. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 297. The trial court
shall allow the parties ten days after the trial court signs its findings of fact and
conclusions of law to request additional findings and conclusions. See Tex. R. Civ.
P. 298. The appeal is abated and all appellate timetables are suspended while the
case is before the trial court. A supplemental record, including any findings of fact
made by the trial court and the trial court’s conclusions of law, any additional
findings and conclusions requested by the parties, and any additional or amended
findings and conclusions made by the trial court, shall be filed with the Court of
Appeals by September 14, 2015. The appeal will be reinstated without further
order of this Court when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed. After
reinstatement of the appeal, the parties may file supplemental briefs addressing the
trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. The supplemental brief of the
appellants shall be due thirty days after the supplemental clerk’s record is filed
2 with the Court of Appeals. The supplemental brief of the appellee shall be due
thirty days after the appellants file their supplemental brief.
ORDER ENTERED August 13, 2015.
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Larry D. Prewitt and Deborah D. Prewitt v. Jackie Neil Norsworthy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-d-prewitt-and-deborah-d-prewitt-v-jackie-neil-norsworthy-texapp-2015.