Larry Crandall Roberts v. State of Florida

262 So. 3d 875
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 2019
Docket18-0332
StatusPublished

This text of 262 So. 3d 875 (Larry Crandall Roberts v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larry Crandall Roberts v. State of Florida, 262 So. 3d 875 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D18-0332 _____________________________

LARRY CRANDALL ROBERTS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Wakulla County. James O. Shelfer, Judge.

January 31, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Larry Crandall Roberts appeals his judgments and sentences for two counts of aggravated assault with a firearm following a nonjury trial. Roberts’s sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in rejecting both his statutory 1 and common law affirmative defenses 2 of citizen’s arrest regarding his use of a

1 See § 810.09(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). 2 In a criminal case, “[a]n affirmative defense does not concern itself with the elements of the offense at all; it concedes them. In effect, an affirmative defense says, ‘Yes, I did it, but I had a good reason.’” State v. Cohen, 568 So. 2d 49, 51−52 (Fla. 1990). shotgun while attempting to detain two unarmed individuals, 3 whom he believed had committed a felony.

A detailed recitation of the facts is unnecessary to our resolution. While we agree with Roberts that he initially had probable cause to effect a citizen’s arrest, the State presented evidence at trial contradicting Roberts’s affirmative defense by showing that he did not act in a reasonable manner when he attempted to detain the two individuals. This factual dispute regarding the affirmative defense was resolved by the trier of fact adversely to Roberts, and the record contains competent substantial evidence supporting his convictions.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, LAMBERT, and EISNAUGLE, Associate Judges, 4 concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Luke Newman of Luke Newman, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Steven E. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

3 One of the individuals was a minor. 4 Sitting as Associate Judges of the First District Court of Appeal in this case by designation and order of the Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cohen
568 So. 2d 49 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 So. 3d 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-crandall-roberts-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.