Larry Charles Clonce v. United States
This text of 432 F.2d 442 (Larry Charles Clonce v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clonce was informed that the court was contemplating summary affirmance of the district court judgment because of the unsubstantial issue presented for our decision. He opposed the assignment without addressing the underlying merits and we granted him an additional period of time to submit further papers which he has now done.
We have thoroughly considered the files and record in this cause and are convinced that the judgment of the district court was correct.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court order of February 25, 1970, 317 F.Supp. 650, denying relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
432 F.2d 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-charles-clonce-v-united-states-ca10-1970.