Larry Barber v. Florida Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 2017·No. 17-1376·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

LARRY BARBER, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D17-1376

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

Opinion filed December 19, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

Larry Barber, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied because the lower court’s denial of

the mandamus petition did not constitute a departure from the essential requirements

of law. To the extent petitioner challenges the lower court’s imposition of a lien on

his inmate trust account, that claim is not preserved because petitioner failed to raise

it below. See Kemp v. McDonough, 955 So. 2d 635, 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

WOLF, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Larry Barber v. Florida Department of Corrections, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Larry Barber v. Florida Department of Corrections (Larry Barber v. Florida Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kemp v. McDonough
955 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)