Larry Barber v. Florida Department of Corrections
This text of Larry Barber v. Florida Department of Corrections (Larry Barber v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
LARRY BARBER, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D17-1376
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent.
___________________________/
Opinion filed December 19, 2017.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
Larry Barber, pro se, Petitioner.
Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied because the lower court’s denial of
the mandamus petition did not constitute a departure from the essential requirements
of law. To the extent petitioner challenges the lower court’s imposition of a lien on
his inmate trust account, that claim is not preserved because petitioner failed to raise
it below. See Kemp v. McDonough, 955 So. 2d 635, 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
WOLF, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Larry Barber v. Florida Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-barber-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2017.