Larry Barber v. Department of Corrections
This text of Larry Barber v. Department of Corrections (Larry Barber v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D20-292 _____________________________
LARRY BARBER,
Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
September 29, 2020
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.
ROBERTS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Larry Barber, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gecelyne S. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Larry Barber v. Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-barber-v-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2020.