Larry A. Woodson v. Larry Powers, Director, Spartanburg County Detention Facility, Attorney General of South Carolina

862 F.2d 315, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15780, 1988 WL 119069
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 27, 1988
Docket88-6721
StatusUnpublished

This text of 862 F.2d 315 (Larry A. Woodson v. Larry Powers, Director, Spartanburg County Detention Facility, Attorney General of South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larry A. Woodson v. Larry Powers, Director, Spartanburg County Detention Facility, Attorney General of South Carolina, 862 F.2d 315, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15780, 1988 WL 119069 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

862 F.2d 315
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Larry A. WOODSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Larry POWERS, Director, Spartanburg County Detention
Facility, Attorney General of South Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 88-6721.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 29, 1988.
Decided Oct. 27, 1988.

Larry Woodson, appellant pro se.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Woodson seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Woodson v. Powers, C/A No. 3:88-1411 (D.S.C. June 21, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Laupert (Oscar Thomas)
862 F.2d 315 (Fourth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
862 F.2d 315, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15780, 1988 WL 119069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-a-woodson-v-larry-powers-director-spartanburg-county-detention-ca4-1988.