Larry a Speet v. Sintel Inc
This text of Larry a Speet v. Sintel Inc (Larry a Speet v. Sintel Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 7, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
156001 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder LARRY A. SPEET and S’TEL GROUP, LLC, Elizabeth T. Clement, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants- Justices Appellants, v SC: 156001 COA: 330168 Kent CC: 12-009225-CK SINTEL, INC., Defendant/Counterplaintiff- Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 11, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
WILDER, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 7, 2018 p0228 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Larry a Speet v. Sintel Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larry-a-speet-v-sintel-inc-mich-2018.