Larrimore v. North Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Larrimore v. North Carolina

332 F. App'x 5

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 1, 2009·No. No. 09-1524·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Bryan Larrimore appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous and imposing monetary sanctions and a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Larrimore v. North Carolina, No. 7:09-cv-00037-D (E.D.N.C. April 2, 2009). We deny Larrimore’s pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Bryan Larrimore appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous and imposing monetary sanctions and a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Larrimore v. North Carolina, No. 7:09-cv-00037-D (E.D.N.C. April 2, 2009). We deny Larrimore’s pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Larrimore v. North Carolina, 332 F. App'x 5 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 5 (Larrimore v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.