Larramore v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Florida

Larramore v. Chapman

150 So. 227, 111 Fla. 754, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2090

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 10, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on writ of error to the judgment of the Circuit Court in and for Union County remanding the petitioner to the custody of the respondent to be dealt with according to law in a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by the petitioner in that court.

Under the issues as made up in this case the same questions were before this Court which were presented in the case of Buchanan v. Chapman, filed February 14th, 1933, reported 146 Sou. 585.

The judgment of the circuit court should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment entered here in the case above cited and authorities there cited. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on writ of error to the judgment of the Circuit Court in and for Union County remanding the petitioner to the custody of the respondent to be dealt with according to law in a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by the petitioner in that court.

Under the issues as made up in this case the same questions were before this Court which were presented in the case of Buchanan v. Chapman, filed February 14th, 1933, reported 146 Sou. 585.

The judgment of the circuit court should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment entered here in the case above cited and authorities there cited. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Larramore v. Chapman, 150 So. 227, 111 Fla. 754, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2090 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

150 So. 227 (Larramore v. Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related