Larrabee v. Inhabitants of Peabody

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Larrabee v. Inhabitants of Peabody

128 Mass. 561, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 151

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJune 25, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 128 Mass. 561 (Larrabee v. Inhabitants of Peabody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Larrabee v. Inhabitants of Peabody, 128 Mass. 561, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 151 (Mass. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Morton, J.

The plaintiff was injured by falling into a trench near a public building used for a town-house and school-house, and brought this action of tort against the town to recover dam ages for the injury. It is not contended that the town is liable as for a defect in a highway. The trench was not in the highway, nor in dangerous proximity to it. But the plaintiff contends that the trench was in dangerous proximity to the way or path leading to the town-house; and that the town is liable to the same extent as a private owner who invites persons to enter his hall would be. If we assume, in favor of the plaintiff, that, upon the evidence, a private owner would be liable to her for her injury, yet we are of opinion that the town is not liable. The only ground upon which it is contended that a city or town is liable for defects in, or negligence in the repair or management of, a building owned by it, is that, at the time the liability attaches, it is using the building for emolument or profit, as a private owner might. Oliver v. Worcester, 102 Mass. 489. Hill v. Boston, 122 Mass. 344. In the present case, this element of liability is wanting. The plaintiff visited the townhouse for the purpose of attending an entertainment given by [562]*562a temperance society. It appeared that, on this occasion, and during the previous summer, the society had the gratuitous use of the hall for their meetings. The town received no compensation or profit from the use. The case, therefore, is not within the reason of the rule relied upon, which creates a liability of the town. The fact that the town had before this occasionally let the town-house for public meetings and entertainments, is immaterial. Such occasional lettings would not create a permanent and continuing liability. The liability, if any, attaches because the town deals with and uses the public building for the purposes of profit, as a private enterprise, and it continues only so long as it thus uses it. Exceptions overruled.

S. C. Bancroft, for the plaintiff. H. Wardwell, for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morton, J.

The plaintiff was injured by falling into a trench near a public building used for a town-house and school-house, and brought this action of tort against the town to recover dam ages for the injury. It is not contended that the town is liable as for a defect in a highway. The trench was not in the highway, nor in dangerous proximity to it. But the plaintiff contends that the trench was in dangerous proximity to the way or path leading to the town-house; and that the town is liable to the same extent as a private owner who invites persons to enter his hall would be. If we assume, in favor of the plaintiff, that, upon the evidence, a private owner would be liable to her for her injury, yet we are of opinion that the town is not liable. The only ground upon which it is contended that a city or town is liable for defects in, or negligence in the repair or management of, a building owned by it, is that, at the time the liability attaches, it is using the building for emolument or profit, as a private owner might. Oliver v. Worcester, 102 Mass. 489. Hill v. Boston, 122 Mass. 344. In the present case, this element of liability is wanting. The plaintiff visited the townhouse for the purpose of attending an entertainment given by [562]*562a temperance society. It appeared that, on this occasion, and during the previous summer, the society had the gratuitous use of the hall for their meetings. The town received no compensation or profit from the use. The case, therefore, is not within the reason of the rule relied upon, which creates a liability of the town. The fact that the town had before this occasionally let the town-house for public meetings and entertainments, is immaterial. Such occasional lettings would not create a permanent and continuing liability. The liability, if any, attaches because the town deals with and uses the public building for the purposes of profit, as a private enterprise, and it continues only so long as it thus uses it. Exceptions overruled.

S. C. Bancroft, for the plaintiff. H. Wardwell, for the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 Mass. 561, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larrabee-v-inhabitants-of-peabody-mass-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack