Larouere v. Larouere

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Larouere v. Larouere

453 So. 2d 516, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1702, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13961

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 1984·No. No. 83-1751·Published

Opinion

RYDER, Chief Judge.

From the record before us, we hold that there was no error in the trial court proceedings. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion and he made a proper decision. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1202-1203 (Fla.1980); Monnar v. Monnar, 422 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Although the marital property was distributed according to the formula set forth in Landay v. Landay, 400 So.2d 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), it comports with that formula approved in Landay v. Landay, 429 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1983).

AFFIRMED.

DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RYDER, Chief Judge.

From the record before us, we hold that there was no error in the trial court proceedings. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion and he made a proper decision. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1202-1203 (Fla.1980); Monnar v. Monnar, 422 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Although the marital property was distributed according to the formula set forth in Landay v. Landay, 400 So.2d 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), it comports with that formula approved in Landay v. Landay, 429 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1983).

AFFIRMED.

DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Larouere v. Larouere, 453 So. 2d 516, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1702, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13961 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

453 So. 2d 516 (Larouere v. Larouere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related