Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Co.

441 F. App'x 202
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 28, 2011
DocketNo. 10-1523
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 441 F. App'x 202 (Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Co., 441 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ruben Larota-Florez and Carmen Rosa Cordova-Pena appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on their state law claims for declaratory judgment and quiet title. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortg. Co., 719 F.Supp.2d 636 (E.D.Va.2010); see also Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., N.A., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hien Pham v. Bank of New York
856 F. Supp. 2d 804 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)
Wolf v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
830 F. Supp. 2d 153 (W.D. Virginia, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 F. App'x 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larota-florez-v-goldman-sachs-mortgage-co-ca4-2011.