Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Co.

441 F. App'x 202
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2011·No. No. 10-1523·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ruben Larota-Florez and Carmen Rosa Cordova-Pena appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on their state law claims for declaratory judgment and quiet title. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortg. Co., 719 F.Supp.2d 636 (E.D.Va.2010); see also Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., N.A., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Co., 441 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2011).

441 F. App'x 202 (Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hien Pham v. Bank of New York
856 F. Supp. 2d 804 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)
Wolf v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
830 F. Supp. 2d 153 (W.D. Virginia, 2011)