LaRose v. Possehl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

LaRose v. Possehl

247 A.D. 764

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1936·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Action by a member of a local union to obtain a vacatur of his suspension and the restoration of Ms rights and to restrain the defendants in respect thereto. Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff has an adequate remedy within Ms orgamzation and has failed to exhaust tMs remedy and that the court has no jurisdiction herein, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer witMn ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by a member of a local union to obtain a vacatur of his suspension and the restoration of Ms rights and to restrain the defendants in respect thereto. Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff has an adequate remedy within Ms orgamzation and has failed to exhaust tMs remedy and that the court has no jurisdiction herein, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer witMn ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

LaRose v. Possehl, 247 A.D. 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 764 (LaRose v. Possehl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.