LaRose v. Possehl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

LaRose v. Possehl

247 A.D. 764

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1936

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 764 (LaRose v. Possehl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LaRose v. Possehl, 247 A.D. 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by a member of a local union to obtain a vacatur of his suspension and the restoration of Ms rights and to restrain the defendants in respect thereto. Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff has an adequate remedy within Ms orgamzation and has failed to exhaust tMs remedy and that the court has no jurisdiction herein, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer witMn ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by a member of a local union to obtain a vacatur of his suspension and the restoration of Ms rights and to restrain the defendants in respect thereto. Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff has an adequate remedy within Ms orgamzation and has failed to exhaust tMs remedy and that the court has no jurisdiction herein, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer witMn ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opimon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larose-v-possehl-nyappdiv-1936.