LaRoque v. Conti

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 23, 2009
• Docket: 09-1174
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1174

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SARA A. CONTI,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,

Party-in-Interest,

ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,

Debtor.

No. 09-1175

and MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,

No. 09-1176

No. 09-1177

2 and

No. 09-1186

No. 09-1263

3 SARA A. CONTI,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00569- NCT; 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; 1:08-cv-00663-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568-NCT; 1:09-cv-00078-NCT)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 23, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Paul LaRoque, Appellant Pro Se. Sara A. Conti, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

4 PER CURIAM:

George Paul LaRoque appeals the district court’s

orders dismissing his appeals from the bankruptcy court and

denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. LaRoque v. Conti,

Nos. 1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00569-NCT; 1:08-cv-00595-NCT;

1:08-cv-00663-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568-NCT; 1:09-00078-NCT (M.D.N.C.

Jan. 30, 2009 & Feb. 13, 2009). We grant LaRoque’s motions to

consolidate his appeals and deny his motions for transcripts and

a certified copy of the record at government expense. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED