LaRoque v. Beck

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 25, 2009
• Docket: 19-2072
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6588

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

THEODIS BECK; JAMES E. LANGSTON; THEODORE WALKER; HEIDI GALETSCHRY,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:09-ct-03025-H)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 25, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Paul LaRoque, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Paul LaRoque appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. LaRoque v.

Beck, No. 5:09-ct-03025-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED