LaRonda Phox v. George E. Fern Co.

557 F. App'x 603
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 4, 2014
Docket13-2816
StatusUnpublished

This text of 557 F. App'x 603 (LaRonda Phox v. George E. Fern Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LaRonda Phox v. George E. Fern Co., 557 F. App'x 603 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

LaRonda Phox appeals following the district court’s 1 entry of final judgment in her employment discrimination action. We have carefully considered Phox’s arguments for reversing the numerous orders she identifies on appeal, and we agree with the district court’s disposition of these matters and its underlying analysis, including its denial of her motion for default judgment against George E. Fern Company, see Norsyn, Inc. v. Desai, 351 F.3d 825, 828 (8th Cir.2003) (reviewing for abuse of discretion), and its grant of summary judgment to International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local 31, see Shaffer v. Potter, 499 F.3d 900, 903 (8th Cir.2007) (de novo review). The judgment of the district court is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny Phox’s motion for a court order.

1

. The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norsyn, Inc. v. Desai
351 F.3d 825 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)
Shaffer v. Potter
499 F.3d 900 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
557 F. App'x 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laronda-phox-v-george-e-fern-co-ca8-2014.