LaRoche v. Butler
89 S.E. 174, 18 Ga. App. 249, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 261
This text of 89 S.E. 174 (LaRoche v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
LaRoche v. Butler, 89 S.E. 174, 18 Ga. App. 249, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 261 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
The only question raised by the motion for a new trial being as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and the verdiet being authorized by the evidence, it was not error for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Consolidated Phosphate Co. v. Sturtevant Co.
93 S.E. 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 174, 18 Ga. App. 249, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laroche-v-butler-gactapp-1916.