LaRoche v. Butler
89 S.E. 174, 18 Ga. App. 249, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 261
Opinion
The only question raised by the motion for a new trial being as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and the verdiet being authorized by the evidence, it was not error for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
LaRoche v. Butler, 89 S.E. 174, 18 Ga. App. 249, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 261 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
89 S.E. 174 (LaRoche v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Consolidated Phosphate Co. v. Sturtevant Co.
93 S.E. 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)