LaRocca v. Pleasant Valley Little League

15 A.D.3d 628, 791 N.Y.S.2d 578, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2005
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 2005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), dated June 11, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law based upon the doctrine of assumption of the risk ordinarily associated with being a spectator at a sporting event (see Akins v Glens Falls City School Dist., 53 NY2d 325 [1981]; Koenig v Town of Huntington, 10 AD3d 632, 633 [2004]; Suarez v HBQVB Athletic Assn., 303 AD2d 396, 397 [2003]; Honohan v Turrone, 297 AD2d 705, 706 [2002]; Lynch v Board of Educ. for Oceanside School Dist., 225 AD2d 741, 741-742 [1996]; Clark v Goshen Sunday Morning Softball League, 122 AD2d 769, 770 [1986]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to present competent evidence that the defendants did not provide adequate supervision or that the defendants unreasonably increased the inherent risks of injury from the game of baseball (see id.; cf. Muniz v Warwick School Dist., 293 AD2d 724 [2002]). Krausman, J.P, Mastro, Rivera and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LaRocca v. Pleasant Valley Little League, 15 A.D.3d 628, 791 N.Y.S.2d 578, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2005 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

15 A.D.3d 628 (LaRocca v. Pleasant Valley Little League) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Demelio v. Playmakers, Inc.
19 Misc. 3d 911 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Cohen v. Sterling Mets, L.P.
17 Misc. 3d 218 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)