LaRocca v. Dalsheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

LaRocca v. Dalsheim

104 A.D.2d 445, 479 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19896

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 20, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.2d 445 (LaRocca v. Dalsheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

LaRocca v. Dalsheim, 104 A.D.2d 445, 479 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— In proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78, the appeals are from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Nicolai, J.), entered August 1,1983, which brings up for review so much of a judgment of the same court (Nicolai, J.), dated December 12, 1983, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination dismissing a petition to restrain the harassment of the petitioner by correctional employees on the ground that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, and (2) a judgment of the same court (Nastasi, J.), entered July 7, 1983, which granted respondent’s motion, inter alia, to dismiss a proceeding challenging petitioner’s work assignments at Downstate Correctional Facility.

Appeal from the judgment entered August 1,1983 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. That judgment was superseded by the judgment dated December 12, 1983, made upon reargument.

Judgment dated December 12, 1983 affirmed, insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion.

Judgment entered July 7, 1983 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78, the appeals are from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Nicolai, J.), entered August 1,1983, which brings up for review so much of a judgment of the same court (Nicolai, J.), dated December 12, 1983, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination dismissing a petition to restrain the harassment of the petitioner by correctional employees on the ground that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, and (2) a judgment of the same court (Nastasi, J.), entered July 7, 1983, which granted respondent’s motion, inter alia, to dismiss a proceeding challenging petitioner’s work assignments at Downstate Correctional Facility.

Appeal from the judgment entered August 1,1983 dismissed, without costs or disbursements. That judgment was superseded by the judgment dated December 12, 1983, made upon reargument.

Judgment dated December 12, 1983 affirmed, insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion.

Judgment entered July 7, 1983 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.2d 445, 479 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larocca-v-dalsheim-nyappdiv-1984.