Larned v. Central Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Larned v. Central Railroad

79 A. 289, 81 N.J.L. 571, 52 Vroom 571, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 174

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 6, 1911·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are content with the reasoning adopted by the Supreme Court in this case, but must not be understood as conceding that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the railroad company.

The judgment under review should be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Reed, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yre-DENBURGH, YrOOM, CONGDON, SULLIVAN, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are content with the reasoning adopted by the Supreme Court in this case, but must not be understood as conceding that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the railroad company.

The judgment under review should be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Reed, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yre-DENBURGH, YrOOM, CONGDON, SULLIVAN, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.

Larned v. Central Railroad, 79 A. 289, 81 N.J.L. 571, 52 Vroom 571, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 174 (N.J. 1911).

Pincite

79 A. 289 (Larned v. Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related