Larned v. Beal
This text of 23 A. 149 (Larned v. Beal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not material in this case whether the corporation de facto was a corporation de jure or not. A want of *185 regularity in its organization would not affect the validity of its contract with the plaintiff, and would not give him, against its members, as unincorporated persons, an action on a contract which he made with them as a corporation. S. F. Bridge v. Fisk, 28 N. H. 171, 178; Ossipee Manf'g Co. v. Canney, 54 N. H. 295, 312, 313; Saunders v. Farmer, 62 N. H. 572; Jewell v. Gilbert, 64 N. H. 13, 18; Case v. Kelly, 133 U. S. 21, 28; Mor. Corp., ss. 744-755.
Judgment for the defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A. 149, 65 N.H. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larned-v-beal-nh-1889.