Larkins Vs. Gilmore
This text of Larkins Vs. Gilmore (Larkins Vs. Gilmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JUSTIN ALEXANDER RASHAD No. 83406 LARKINS, Appellant, FILED vs. LUCY GILMORE, OCT 21 2021 Res s ondent. A. BROWN PROW COURT
DEPU CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order terminating appellant's parental rights. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Heidi Almase, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Appellant states in his notice of appeal that he appeals from an order terminating his parental rights, entered in district court case R-12-169268- R, and dated February of 2016. However, no order terminating parental rights appears on the district court docket sheet. The district court docket sheet also does not indicate that any petition or motion to terminate parental rights was filed. Accordingly, as appellant fails to identify an appealable order entered in the underlying district court case, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J. Cadish
Pickering
'1441 11" cc: Hon. Heidi Almase, District Judge, Family Court Division Justin Alexander Rashad Larkins Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A .156405 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Larkins Vs. Gilmore, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larkins-vs-gilmore-nev-2021.