Larkins v. Dixon
This text of Larkins v. Dixon (Larkins v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-0776 _____________________________
WILBERT LARKINS,
Petitioner,
v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
April 15, 2026
PER CURIAM.
This Court treats the appeal as invoking our certiorari jurisdiction and the third amended initial brief as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 703 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved by 720 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 1998). So construed, the petition is denied.
RAY, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Wilbert Larkins, pro se, Petitioner.
Kelly R. Forren, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Larkins v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/larkins-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2026.